Airline’s New “Customer Of Size” Policy Sparks Backlash

Southwest Airlines is facing backlash over its controversial new “Customer of Size” policy.

The policy, which states that overweight customers must purchase additional seats, has been called a “fat tax” and criticized for its lack of clarity and objective criteria.

It requires plus-sized travelers to “proactively” buy an additional seat and states that the airline can decide “in its sole discretion” who must purchase the extra seat, citing customer safety and comfort as justification.

Southwest Airlines is being slammed over its new “cruel” policy for plus-size passengers
Southwest Airlines plane flying over city landscape illustrating airline customer of size policy backlash.

Image credits: Shui Miles/Unsplash

The policy is already causing issues. On March 6, Jessica Skinner was stopped by a Southwest agent when she was flying from Tampa to Austin-Bergstrom International Airport.

She said that, despite losing 200 pounds (90 kg) and not extending beyond her seat, she was told she was too big and had to buy an extra seat. The discussion with the Southwest supervisor caused her to miss the deadline to check her bag.

“She walks to me, and she’s just like, ‘You’re going to need an extra seat because you’re wide at the bottom and you’re going to spill into the other seat, and it’s for the comfort of our other customers, and you won’t be able to fit.’ She was really rude about it,” she told SFGATE.

Passenger fastening airplane seatbelt highlights airline customer of size policy controversy and backlash.

Image credits: Andrej Lišakov/Unsplash

Erika DeBoer faced a similar issue with the airline. When she arrived at the airport, a Southwest gate worker told her she needed to spend $176 on an additional seat for the “safety and comfort” of other passengers. 

The only passenger sitting next to her was her best friend, who clarified that she had no issue sitting next to Erika.

“The part that lingers the most is the words used. ‘Safety and comfort’ of other passengers. They just kept repeating it like robots without any care for the actual situation,” Erika told People.

The “Customer of Size” policy is being criticized for its lack of objective criteria for when someone should book an extra seatPassenger walking down airplane aisle holding a red water bottle amid airline's new customer of size policy controversy.

Image credits: jaebaeofficialComment expressing that fat people are human beings and criticizing views related to airline customer of size policy backlash.

After her flight, the traveler contacted Southwest about the issue. She received a refund for the extra ticket and a $150 voucher.

A separate customer, Grace Simpson, said a Southwest worker flagged her as a “customer of size” and decided she needed to buy an extra ticket.

She had taken a Southwest flight from Norfolk to Baltimore without issue on February 10 but was told she was a “customer of size” by a gate agent before her connecting flight in San Diego.

“I told him that I had already flown from Norfolk to Baltimore without issue, so I was not going to buy another ticket,” Grace said in a video, adding that the issue left her feeling “embarrassed.”

Passengers standing and seated in a crowded airplane cabin amid airline customer of size policy backlash discussion.

Image credits: Chris Brignola/Unsplash

Comment on airline’s new customer of size policy mentioning charging tall people for encroachment in neighbor’s space.

She also said that the airline worker who enforced the policy shared her discomfort.

“The supervisor who approached me was clearly uncomfortable and embarrassed to single me out and discuss my body,” she said. “In many ways, it felt unfair to both of us. 

“While I do believe he had some discretion in how he handled the situation, it was evident that he was put in a difficult position enforcing a policy he did not create.”

Ultimately, Grace was assigned to a seat in the back of the plane adjacent to an empty seat.

The airline previously offered complimentary extra seats to plus-size travelersPassenger struggling with airline seatbelt on plane highlighting airline customer of size policy issue.

Image credits: emsgeorgia

A Southwest spokesperson told The Independent that any customer who feels they may be a “customer of size” should contact the airline in advance.

“We ask Customers who may need an extra seat to let us know in advance of their day of travel so we can do our best to accommodate their needs,” the spokesperson said.

“Our goal is always to provide a comfortable experience for everyone on board; however, with assigned seating, adjacent seats may sometimes already be occupied.”

ALT text: Comment discussing airline’s new customer of size policy and the need to pay for multiple seats if body takes up space.

Comment discussing airline's new customer of size policy and concerns about shrinking seats impacting comfort and safety.

Southwest notes that armrests are considered the “definitive boundary” between seats, so those who “encroach upon the neighboring seat(s) should proactively purchase” an extra ticket.

Still, the carrier states that it “may determine, in its sole discretion, that an additional seat is necessary for safety purposes.”

Before the change, the airline allowed plus-size passengers to request a complimentary extra seat at the gate or receive a refund after buying one in advance. The policy had been in place for over 30 years and ended in January.

Man waiting at airport terminal with Southwest signs visible, related to airline customer of size policy backlash.

Image credits: Stefan Zaklin/ Getty Images

Comment expressing disappointment about airline's new customer of size policy harming its reputation.

Southwest’s new policy more closely resembles those of most other major US airlines, which do not guarantee a refund for purchasing an extra seat. Under the new rule, a refund for the second seat is only guaranteed if the flight departs with at least one open seat in the same fare class.

Flyers who did not book their ticket in advance can be forced to buy an extra ticket at the airport.

“If you did not purchase an additional seat in advance and our Employees determine that a second seat is needed,” the airline states. “You will be required to purchase an additional seat and pay any applicable seat fee at the airport (at the applicable fare available on the day of travel).”

The new policy states that airline employees can determine who needs an extra seat “at their sole discretion”Passenger affected by airline's new customer of size policy sitting in an airplane seat, waving with a water bottle nearby.

Image credits: jaebaeofficial

User comment discussing airline seat sizes and suggesting petitions related to the airline's new customer of size policy backlash.

“I guess I was a bit embarrassed. I was upset more than anything,” Kari McCaw told SFGATE after she was stopped and told to buy an extra seat.

“You just made this arbitrary look at my body. … I don’t have any hips, so I sit in seats just fine all the time.”

Influencer Samyra Miller dubbed the policy a “fat tax” and slammed the subjective nature of its enforcement.

“It is discrimination that is at the discretion and fatphobia of whoever is at work that day,” she said.

Passenger struggling with cramped airplane seat space highlighting airline's new customer of size policy backlash.

Image credits: sermedmaktouf

In her viral video, Erika said she is considered “bigger, plus-size, overweight, fat, or whatever you wanna call it,” and claimed she was told to purchase an extra seat despite never needing more than one.

On social media, critics have called the policy “cruel” and accused Southwest, which had a welcoming reputation, of “profiling and discriminating against customers just to make more money.”

Social media users debated Southwest’s “Customer of Size” policyComment expressing concern about airline's new customer of size policy and the impact on seat refunds and solutions.

Comment criticizing airline’s new customer of size policy, urging focus on seat size instead of people.

Comment discussing perspectives on airline’s new customer of size policy and seating accommodations concerns.

Social media comment discussing the airline's new customer of size policy and reactions from users.

Comment from Joanna VonCulin criticizing airline’s new customer of size policy and its associated prejudice on social media.

User comment criticizing airline's new customer of size policy, mentioning potential disability discrimination and space concerns.

Comment explaining airline’s new customer of size policy and discussing fairness and business perspective on seat occupancy.

A Facebook comment criticizing airline’s new customer of size policy, mentioning increased weight and jet fuel burning.

Screenshot of a social media comment discussing airline’s new customer of size policy and charges for extra wide passengers.

Comment highlighting a question about bodybuilders and relating to airline's new customer of size policy backlash discussion.

Comment by Shawn Lee discussing extra charges for oversize parcels, related to airline's customer of size policy backlash.

Comment by Mike Melt discussing airline customer of size policy and issues with agents enforcing extra seat charges.

Comment from user Kev BCo addressing Team Airline regarding the airline's new customer of size policy backlash.

Comment from Marcus Velez discussing airline's new customer of size policy and advising caution before purchasing.

Screenshot of a social media comment criticizing the airline's new customer of size policy requiring payment for two seats.

Comment from Alicia Rogers expressing concern about fairness and comfort related to airline's new customer of size policy backlash.

User comment discussing airline's new customer of size policy requiring passengers taking two seats to pay for both.

 

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.